Wednesday, August 3, 2016

Here We Go Again!



 Maybe it’s my age, or perhaps the sensation that time passes so quickly, and the older we get the faster it seems to fly by. It seems to me that I wrote on this subject just last week. Has it been four years since we elected (or re-elected) our President? Has it actually been that long? Last week we officially entered into the season of political ads, presidential and vice-presidential debates, and volatile discussions at the local coffee shop, peppered no doubt by the distortions of the media so as to present their favorite candidate as far superior to the one who might have won the other party’s nomination. My dad has pointed out that the goals of a politician are two-fold: (1) Get elected, and (2) get re-elected. Everything else is subservient to these two self-imposed goals. I must confess that this year’s primary races for both parties has been unique (if I can use such a mild term). Some of you might find yourselves thinking with me, “Here we go again!” Having almost completed the three score and ten years referred to by Moses (Psalms 90:10), I have come to appreciate even more the sentiments of that great prophet as he stretches the 70 years to a full eight decades and concludes, “Yet is their pride but labor and sorrow; For it is soon gone, and we fly away.” I have lived through the Presidency of Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush (George H.W.), Clinton, Bush (George W), and Obama, though I scarce remember the policies, practices, or popularity of the first two. Good Presidents have come and gone, and bad Presidents have been endured by the people who anxiously look forward to that time when their voice can be heard in the voting booth once again. I have had the privilege of voting in every Presidential election since Lyndon Johnson. If my calculations are correct, I have, in my fifty some years as a part of the electorate of this country, been exposed to more than 4,000 political ads over the years, and pulled the lever to cast my vote, some twelve times.   So, I feel that what I am about to say is at least worthy of some consideration by those of us who will be voting in this year’s upcoming election as we select yet another man (or woman, as the case may be) to serve in the capacity of President of these United States.  May I suggest that you take into consideration the following thoughts as you walk into that booth and cast your vote for who will fill the most important office in our troubled world. We have only three months in which to educate ourselves as to the character of the person and what we can expect if he/she is elected to the office. 

First, the Christian takes into that voting booth something that others simply do not possess: the principles of truth and righteousness set forth in the Bible.  The Psalmist said that the word of God is his “light” and “lamp” (Psa. 119:105).  When the child of God steps into that voting booth, he uses that light to roll back the curtain that might otherwise hide the truth about the candidate’s policies and promises that are so often overlooked on the campaign trail.  Every promise that each candidate made, every policy to which he holds, is to be measured in the light of God’s word; not the emotions of the heart. 

Second, when the child of God enters that booth he takes with him the realization that he will answer to God as to the choice he makes. Since the time we were small children we have been reminded again and again that every single American plays a vital role in governmental affairs. This is a government of the people. Hence, every American has an influence on who sits behind that desk in the Oval Office. Since our vote plays a part in who fills the office of President, then it behooves us to vote with the realization that God is watching over our shoulder when we pull that lever or punch that card. Were Christ to stand beside you as you cast your vote this coming November, how would YOU vote? If we are instrumental in putting an ungodly man and/or woman into office, then we will answer to God for the part we played in the process. 

Third, each party and candidate should be measured in the light of what God’s word teaches. For a moment, let us simply ignore party names. Instead let us simply call them party “a” and party “b.” It is an undeniable truth supported by public proclamation, and party dogma, that one of these parties supports homosexuality as a way of life, abortion on demand, and has supported such liberal and immoral organizations as the ACLU, Planned Parenthood, and the National Gay and Lesbian organization. The other party opposes abortion (at least for now), believes in the Biblical design for the home and the sanctity of marriage, and seeks to maintain  the moral and ethical values of the founders of this country.  When you step into that booth, the child of God will not in any way, form or fashion, pull that lever in favor of a candidate or party that opposes all that is holy and godly. 

Finally, it is becoming increasingly evident that we may very well have to choose between the lesser of two evils, so far as the Presidential candidate is concerned. Personally speaking, I cannot recall an election season in which both candidates from the two leading parties have such a negative favorable rating among the electorate.  The latest statistic I read indicates that almost 70% of the American voters do not like either candidate, and, if given a viable choice, would break with the two party system and elect an independent.

The late Clarence Darrow once said, “When I was a boy I was told that anybody could become President; I’m beginning to believe it.” If the unholy and ungodly element in our society manages to take control of the major branches of our government, then the words of Clarence Darrow take on a whole new meaning.  As you consider the “pool” of Presidential possibilities, keep these thoughts in mind.  Keep in mind that this year’s election is a crucial point in our history as a nation.  Please, don’t approach this year’s election with the ho-hum attitude of, “Here we go again.”

~~~~~~
  
On the lighter side:  “I hear you made a million dollars in oil in Texas,” said one man to another. Replied the second, “Well, that report is substantially correct, except it wasn’t in Texas, it was Oklahoma; and its wasn’t in oil, it was gas; and it wasn’t me, it was my brother-in-law; and it wasn’t a million, it was a hundred thousand; and he didn’t make it, he lost it.” While we might chuckle at the above story, it well illustrates the uncontrollable nature of gossip.  Once a story has been launched, like a ship without a rudder upon the merciless sea, it is tossed to and fro by the wild imaginations of men who would twist, change, or outright lie about what they have heard.  Common sense tells us to be careful in communication.  Facts are often ignored by those who would seek to impress others with either good news, or bad.  We are admonished by God’s word to “lie not one to another,” and to always let our speech be seasoned with salt. Gossip is unhealthy communication.  Before passing along any information let us ask, (1) Is it true? (2) Is it beneficial to my hearer? and (3) Is it really all that important that I tell this to others?  And keep in mind that our Lord told us, “Take heed what ye hear: with what measure ye mete it shall be measured unto you; and more shall be given unto you” (Mark 4:24).



by Tom Wacaster






Monday, August 1, 2016

Luke 22:32 But I have prayed for thee, that thy faith fail not: and when thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.



The real test of our faith is not how many times we stumble and fall, but how many times we pick ourselves up and resume the battle. The weak in faith will give up and quit the faith. The strong will continue to fight the battle.
Jesus told Peter that his faith would be tested and that he would fail the test. He was referring to Peter’s denial of Him three times on this very night of His betrayal. But He also told Peter that He prayed his faith would not fail. At that point in time when the Lord spoke, Peter did not understand what Christ was talking about. He boasted that he would follow Jesus anywhere. But Peter denied Christ. His faith suffered a terrible setback and he wept bitterly (Luke 22:55-62).
But, it would be the last time that Peter would deny His Lord and Saviour. Did he stumble? Yes, he did. Did he fall? Yes, he did. Did he pick himself up? Certainly, he did. He came back stronger to fight the battle. He was converted; he returned to the Lord. He was in a position to strengthen others who had fallen.
The best can fail. Even a man like Peter, curses and denies that he knows his Lord. But, Jesus said, “When thou are converted, strengthen thy brethren.” This statement teaches us one thing: Though we fail, we can recover. We do not need to remain a failure; we can come back stronger and be in a position to help others.
The Chinese has this proverb: “Failure is the mother of success.” Every successful man has encountered failures. Thomas Edison said: “I have no failures. I’ve just found 10,000 ways that won’t work.” Indeed, every failure is a lesson.
Failure should be our teacher, not our undertaker. Failure is delay, not defeat. It is a temporary detour, not a dead end. Failure is something we can avoid only by saying nothing, doing nothing, and being nothing.” - Denis Waitley
It is all right to fail. It is not all right to quit. We have to make a comeback (converted). Sometimes, we fall into temptations but we don’t have to remain in that state. The prodigal son did not spend the rest of his life feeding the pigs. But he came to himself and decided to return to his father (Luke 15:15-20). He was converted.
It is good to see some who have fallen away return to the Lord. They have been converted again. And the Lord says: “When thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren.” It tells us one thing: When a brother has returned to the fold, it is only right for them to start being active and help the brethren.
Sometimes, we see a brother who had fallen away returned but he became inactive. He did not want to be involved in anything. He avoided anyone who wants to help him. He felt he had failed and wasn’t a good example to help anyone. But the end result is that he failed again. He left the Lord again.
When one stops trying, it means he is remaining in his failure mode and that is to fail. If Thomas Edison had believed in failure, we would still be living in darkness. If Henry Ford had given up, we would still be riding on horseback. If Alexander Graham Bell had given in to the clutches of failure, we would be spending less time staring at those small plastic things we call phones that rule our lives today. But they keep trying and their inspirations help others to succeed.
The lessons we learn from our mistakes are truly invaluable. They become our experiences to teach others. When we have failed and made a comeback, let us strengthen our brethren. We can teach them how to overcome just as we have overcome.
Jimmy Lau
Psa 119:97  Oh how love I thy law! It is my meditation all the day.

Luke 23:43 And Jesus said unto him, Verily I say unto thee, To day shalt thou be with me in paradise.


There were two thieves. One was penitent and the other was not. The impenitent thief derided the Lord Jesus and challenged Him: “If thou be Christ, save thyself and us” (Luke 23:379). The sceptics are always challenging God: “IF THOU BE!” The devil challenged Christ in the wilderness with the same scepticism: “If Thou be” (Matt 4:3, 6). Today’s sceptics are saying the same thing: “If He is God…” The truth is that God had come down and revealed Himself in the person Jesus Christ and true enough, the unbelievers still remain in their unbelief. Christ had performed many miracles that proved Him to be the Son of God but the Jews did not believe Him but crucified Him. The impenitent thief would remain in his unbelief even if Jesus had saved them.

The penitent thief was different. He said: “Lord, remember me when thou comest into thy kingdom” (Luke 23:42). It was here that Jesus replied: “Today shalt thou be with me in paradise” (Luke 23:43).
The denominations are quick to jump on this statement and say: “See, the thief on the cross was saved without baptism. Baptism is therefore not necessary for salvation.”
They have forgotten these facts:

1. The thief on the cross is not an example of salvation for us to follow. His salvation is never a pattern for us to follow. He was in an extraordinary circumstance with an extraordinary person beside him who had the power to forgive sin (Mark 2:5, 10).

2. With reference to Baptism, there is no proof that the thief had not previously submitted to John's baptism. He could also have been submitted to Christ’s baptism during His ministry (John 4:1).

3. The thief knew about the kingdom. Both John and Jesus preached about the coming kingdom (Matt 3:2; 4:17). The thief could have been a disciple of John or Christ at one point in time. He showed remorse at the cross and returned to God and was admitted into the kingdom.

4. The thief lived under a different dispensation. The New Covenant did not come into effect until Christ died (Heb 9:15-18). Christ was still alive when He made that statement.

5. The baptism of the Great Commission was given only almost forty days later after the crucifixion (Mark 16:16). The thief could not obey a command that was not yet given. 

The denomination chose to ignore the nine cases of conversion by baptism in the book of Acts but selectively chose one which was never the pattern of the New Testament conversion for us to follow and intentionally ignoring the fact the command to baptise was given only after Christ had resurrected from the tomb. 

Baptism was a command of the Lord Jesus: "He that believeth (the gospel) and is baptized shall be saved" (Mark 16: 16). The apostolic testimony is: "Repent, and be baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins" (Acts 2: 38). It follows a pattern of the death, burial and resurrection of Christ: "We are buried with him by baptism into death, that like as Christ was raised up from the dead by the glory of the Father, even so we also should walk in newness of life ; for if we are planted together in the likeness of his death, we shall be also in the likeness of his resurrection" (Rom 6:4, 5). 

The devil does not want anyone to have his sins wash away and therefore the doctrine that rejects baptism that washes away sins is a doctrine of the devil. The scripture teaches that when one has believed, it is necessary to be baptized; that those who do so have all their past sins forgiven, and are thus introduced into Christ, whose death and resurrection is symbolized by their being buried in water, and then raised out of it. Those who are not so "planted in the likeness of Christ's death" have not "put on Christ," and will never be "planted in the likeness of his resurrection." 

Baptism washes away sins (Acts 22:16) and does save us (1 Pet 3:21). The thief on the cross is not a pattern for us and has never been. Let us abide by the command of the Lord: “He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved” (Mark 16:16).

Jimmy Lau
Psa 119:97  Oh how love I thy law! It is my meditation all the day.