We
have here an account of the apostle Paul rebuking another apostle, Peter. Peter
was the oldest, and probably the most honoured of the apostles. Yet Paul did
not hesitate to resist him in a case where Peter was manifestly wrong,
What
was the problem? Initially, Peter was eating with the Gentile Christians. But
when certain Jews sent by James arrived, Peter quickly withdrew and separated
himself from the Gentile Christians, fearing them of the circumcision. What was
he afraid of? He was afraid what the Jews might think of him eating with the
Gentiles. The Jews would not eat with the Gentiles.
What
was the consequence of Peter’s action? Other Jews and even Barnabas also
withdrew themselves, following Peter’s example.
What
messages was Peter sending across?
1. To the Jews - It
was wrong to have fellowship with the Gentiles.
2. To the Gentiles -
He was embarrassing the Gentile Christians and implying they were outcasts.
They were treated as strangers and not brethren in the Lord.
3. Upon himself – He
was contradicting the very message he preached. He had preached that “God is
no respecter of persons: But in every nation he that feareth him, and worketh
righteousness, is accepted with him,” (Acts 10:34-35). He had convinced the
Jews at Jerusalem that “God also to the Gentiles granted repentance unto
life,” (Acts 11:18A). But now, his action seemed otherwise.
4. On the whole – He
was confusing everyone – Were the Gentile converts brethren or not? Can the
Jewish Christians have or have not fellowship with the Gentile Christians? Are
they brethren together?
Peter
clearly sinned at this point when he offended the Gentile brethren and stumbled
the Jews. Paul rebuked him sharply and called his action hypocrisy. It was
hypocrisy because he acted against his better convictions, as if it were really
wrong to eat with Gentiles. Peter was self-condemned; he showed inconsistency between
his preaching and his conduct.
What
lessons can we learn from this event that transpired?
1. Men are fallible.
Even Peter, an apostle, sometimes caved in because he was fearful. It shows us
that we must not idolised men but stick to the path of truth. The Bereans were
praiseworthy because they checked even the preaching of the apostle Paul to see
if it was the truth (Acts 17:11). It is an example to everyone: Don’t believe
every word you hear, even if it is from your preacher or elder; check it up
with the word of God (2 Tim 2:15).
2. Leaders must be
consistent. Peter’s action was confusing to both the Jews and the Gentiles.
What they heard and what they saw were different. Peter had preached that the
gospel of repentance to salvation was available to the Gentiles. His action
indicated otherwise. His inconsistency confused everyone. In fact, it was
downright sinful. To the Gentile Christians, he had offended and embarrassed
them. To the Jewish Christians, he had stumbled them and caused them to sin
like him. A leader must set the right example so as not to stumble or offend
anyone (Matt 18:6).
3. The power of
influence. Peter’s action caused some Jews and even strong Christian like
Barnabas to follow in his sinful way. Clearly, no man is an island. Everyone is
a leader in his own ways. Others are watching and someone is bound to follow
your action even if it is wrong. Therefore, let us be careful of our conduct –
what we say and what we do (1 Tim 4:12).
4. Public sin
requires a public rebuke. Such as sin openly should be rebuked openly. In this
instance, the public rebuke was necessary, as it was essential in the
circumstances to establish fixed principles for all time. Was Paul’s action
unloving and unkind? It would be if it had been done with haughtiness and
evil intention towards Peter. But I doubt Paul finds pleasure in doing it. The
sin was serious; it destroyed everything that had stood for and preached on. It
had to be addressed immediately; obviously and with love. “But speaking the
truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even
Christ” (Eph 4:15). The rebuke was fully justified.
5. Stand up for the
truth. Is truth important to you? It has to be! Truth is of paramount
importance. No one can believe a lie and still goes to heaven (John 14:6). Eve
believed a lie and brought eternal death, not eternal life into this world.
There are times when controversies with regard to doctrines will arise in the
Church. The church has to decide to stand for the truth or follow the brother
who is teaching error. It is a duty of paramount importance. It is a decision
that decides the fate of the church – to stand with God or with the devil. In
Revelation 2:12-15. We are told of the church in Pergamos who allowed the false
doctrines of Balaam to be taught from her pulpit. Hear the Lord’s warning: “Repent;
or else I will come unto thee quickly, and will fight against them with the
sword of my mouth”(Rev 2:16).
Action
speaks louder than words. Let us be careful of our actions. Others are watching
and some will follow. Let us do what is right.
Jimmy Lau
Psa 119:97 Oh ho
No comments:
Post a Comment